Most Popular

  • The Hard Lie
    How former Ticket host Greg Williams destroyed the most dynamic duo in Dallas talk radio through drugs, deceit and disaffection
  • American Girls
    Crossing between American and Egyptian cultures, he Said girls made one deadly misstep: They fell in love
  • The Dirt Doctor
    How radio show host Howard Garrett pushed Dallas to the center of the organic gardening movement through passion, principle and molasses
  • The Caretaker
    One mother's crusade to better the life of her mentally retarded son and the system that failed him
  • Our 20th Music Awards
    1988-2008: Two Decades of DOMA

Recent Articles

Recent Articles by Patrick Williams

National Features >

  • SF Weekly

    Identity Plagiarism

    A blogger steals someone else's life story and calls it her own.

    By Ashley Harrell

  • Westword

    Fuel's Gold

    How William Orr's quest for better, cheaper gas became a crime.

    By Alan Prendergast

  • Miami New Times

    Mold Over Miami

    The family of a dead judge blames a creeping fungus in the federal courthouse.

    By Tim Elfrink

  • The Pitch

    McCain Girl

    I worked at Kmart with John McCain's director of strategy.

    By Alan Scherstuhl

Kids Rule

By Patrick Williams

Published on May 08, 2008

Kids rule: Buzz was wondering when the Liberty Legal Institute, that Dallas-based network of lawyers who labor on behalf of religious freedom and parental rights, would weigh in on Texas authorities' raid on the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints compound in West Texas.

How could Liberty Legal not say something about the case in which more than 460 children were taken from the polygamists' ranch last month? The cops searched the church's property and took custody of the children based on what, apparently, was a fake allegation of sexual abuse. That's not good. So what if some of the "wives" were knocked up as young as 14 or so? That's between their families and God, right?

Wait. Don't answer that. Total rhetorical question. Of course 14-year-old girls shouldn't be raised in a cult and married off to skeezy old men, unless of course, they think...or believe...their choice, of course...or their parents...or God...something.

Ouch, our head. This is the sort of uncomfortable talk that's wisely banned in barber shops, because it's just going to lead to a fight, which sort of explains Liberty Legal's measured friend-of-the-court brief filed in 3rd Court of Appeals in Austin. "We do not side with one side or the other," the institute's Roger Byron took pains to remind Buzz before referring us to the brief itself. It essentially reminds the justices of the legal standard they should apply when trying to untangle the mare's nest of abuse claims versus claims of religious freedom and parental rights.

"Evidence and a finding that the state has shown sexual exploitation or misconduct involving minors, or an imminent threat to the health, safety or welfare of minors, provide both the state's compelling interest under strict scrutiny and a categorical exemption from any protections otherwise available under the church autonomy doctrine," the brief reads. In other words, don't try hiding in the pews because the First Amendment ain't gonna protect you.

Of course, one might argue that the state might have had some evidence of that compelling interest in hand before raiding a religious compound.

And Buzz? What does our finely honed legal mind think of the FLDS case? Well, while we don't like the sight of cops willy-nilly snatching kids from otherwise decent parents, we refer to the precedent of "Cartman Joins NAMBLA," a South Park episode touching on a similarly thorny issue of freedom and sex with kids. To quote that brilliant legal scholar Stan Marsh: "You know, we believe in equality for everybody, and tolerance, and all that gay stuff, but dude, fuck you."



Dallas Observer Insiders

  • Local food, music and news blasts
  • Free Stuff
Backpage.com