Most Popular
-
Is the 'Woman Caught in Adultery' Really Part of Scripture?
-
Dallas' The Bridge Homeless Center's Progressive Approach May Actually Make a Difference
With a no-hassles approach to panhandlers, Dallas' new shelter hopes to kill homelessness with kindness
-
With the Addition of Pacman Jones, Valley Ranch Has Become a Halfway House
-
DART Needs to Build a Subway Downtown
If DART backtracks on its subway promise, downtown traffic will be even more congested
-
Old Man River
-
Denton Bands Like South San Gabriel, The Drams Twist Traditional "Texas Music" Sound (16)
-
Battle Against Teaching Evolution in Texas Begins (37)
Should creationism win out, textbooks throughout the countrynot just Texaswill challenge the theory of evolution in science curricula
-
Demanding Answers as the Dallas Convention Center Hotel Moves Forward (13)
As Mayor Tom Leppert pushes for a convention center hotel, critics demand more details and less tax money. At least, those who haven't been silenced do.
-
DART Needs to Build a Subway Downtown (11)
If DART backtracks on its subway promise, downtown traffic will be even more congested
-
Family Court Judge Sheds Light on Unfair Child Support Practices in Texas (47)
Judge David Hanschen lets men challenge whether the kids they support are theirs. And the Texas Attorney General's Office is pissed.
-
Is the 'Woman Caught in Adultery' Really Part of Scripture?
-
Dallas' The Bridge Homeless Center's Progressive Approach May Actually Make a Difference
With a no-hassles approach to panhandlers, Dallas' new shelter hopes to kill homelessness with kindness
-
With the Addition of Pacman Jones, Valley Ranch Has Become a Halfway House
-
DART Needs to Build a Subway Downtown
If DART backtracks on its subway promise, downtown traffic will be even more congested
-
Old Man River
-
Mayor Tom Is Far From a Guitar Hero
04:03PM 05/16/08 -
J.M.W. Turner, Before They Turn Out the Lights on DMA Exhibit on Sunday
03:16PM 05/16/08 -
Good Friday: Paul Slavens, Dark Meat, Be Your Own Pet, Tomorrowpeople, Shibboleth, Radiohead, Japanther, Daniel Folmer
06:30PM 05/16/08 -
Playback: The Week (5/9/08 - 5/16/08) In Review
05:24PM 05/16/08 -
David Beckham: Out of Sight. Out of Mind.
04:15PM 05/16/08 -
Jonestown Just Got, Um, Affordable?
02:30PM 05/16/08
What we are writing about
- Austin
- Avi Adelman
- Barack Obama
- baseball
- boxing
- cheap lunch
- Craig Watkins
- creationism
- Dallas Cowboys
- Dallas Mavericks
- Daniel Day-Lewis
- DART
- Deep Ellum
- DVD releases
- evolution
- Guitar Hero
- illegal immigrants
- Jason Kidd
- Little Mexico
- Lynn Flint Shaw
- Mexicans
- Nintendo Wii
- Oak Cliff
- Playstation 3
- Rufus Shaw
- sex advice
- tacos
- Texas Rangers
- There Will Be Blood
- Tony Romo
Recent Articles By Glenna Whitley
-
Dallas Has a Real-Life Dr. Gregory House in Dr. Richard Buch
Some call Dr. Buch a troubled genius. His ex-patients and hospital bosses call him trouble.
-
Dallas Lawyer Specializes in Animal Welfare and Rights
Plus, if you want to bequeath your savings to Sparky she'll help you set up a pet trust
-
Turning the Tables on Trinity Foundation
Hey, Ole, is that a mote or a beam in your eye?
-
Crazy Fish May Redefine Computer Industry
He claims to have invented e-mail. He holds a world skydiving record. But his current invention promises to top them all
-
Joyce King is Promoting Justice to the Masses
National Features
-
SF Weekly
Viva Farolito!
Former pros from Latin America help make an "amateur" soccer team unstoppable.
By Lauren Smiley -
Miami New Times
Love is No Contract
A Florida man sues his girlfriend-for dumping him.
By Isaiah Thompson -
Houston Press
The Myth of the Bachelor's Degree
A growing number of educators face a hard truth: not every kid is college material.
By Todd Spivak
White Rock Lake Neighbors Want to Know Whose Bright Idea It Was to Install Lights
By Glenna Whitley
Published: May 1, 2008
After moving into his new contemporary home on a bluff overlooking White Rock Lake, Chip Northrup was riding his bicycle when he noticed 20-foot-tall light poles sprouting on the west side of the park.
The closely planted poles triggered alarm bells in his head.
As a former member of the White Rock Task Force, which in 2005 considered installing security lights around the lake's 9.5-mile perimeter, Northrup thought the idea had been dropped.
In addition to 46 lights now being installed on the west-side parking lots, 90-100 will be planted around the lake in the next two years.
"This is a nature preserve," says Northrup, who lives in the Peninsula neighborhood. "The police were not asking for it. The park board didn't have the budget to pay for the electricity to run the damn things. I thought it was a dead issue. When I left [the task force], there would be some lights on critical areas only, such as parking lots."
The project was spearheaded by the White Rock Lake Foundation; board member Susan Falvo says the impetus was safety.
"The lake is very safe," Falvo says. "This is strictly something to make sure we are proactive on security before there is a problem."
Northrup calls the project pointless and says the proposed "security lights" will cause light pollution and won't increase safety.
"There's no statistical evidence there's a lot of crime committed on the lake," he says. "Show me the body count from the lake last year. I think it's zero. The only argument for security and safety is on the lots."
Northrup was surprised to discover that without any polling of the public or meetings with neighborhood associations, an expanded lighting project went into the park department's master plan for White Rock Lake.
Richard Stauffer, parks department project manager, says that 46 lights are now being installed at five parking lots off West Lawther Drive and down by the old pump house. The 150-watt lights are specially designed for White Rock Lake, with spun-concrete poles and acorn-shaped fixtures. Each costs $6,120. Where they will be placed is still being decided.
"It's dependent on location and getting service to them," Stauffer says. "We have to extend service with TXU to get power to the location."
The first phase includes money for repairs to the spillway, at a cost of about $400,000 from the 2003 and 2006 city bond issues. The next phase will put 90-100 lights in east-side lots and dark areas on the trail; these security lights will be paid for by about $400,000 in funds from the November 2009 bond program.
"They are intended for portions of the trail that need security lights on the east side where the trails go through the woods and security might be a concern," says Willis Winters, assistant director of the parks and recreation department. "The park staff has walked the trail with the Dallas Police Department as to where the lights should be placed. I don't know if 100 lights will address the needs at White Rock Lake. There are still a lot of parking lots on the east side."
The lights shed a "golden white color that renders in the earth-tone colors" matching the native stone and landscaping, Stauffer says.
Northrup calls their "dirty orange glow" ugly.
"These are the standard orange crime lights used in many secondary street fixtures," Northrup says. "They cost less to buy, last longer and use less current. The lake is going to look like a maximum security prison at night. This will effectively ruin night views on both sides of the lake."
Northrup says that during task force meetings the project was pushed by a sales consultant for Hossley Lighting, not Dallas police.
"He was at every meeting with slide presentations and all," Northrup says. "If someone had an objection, he'd stand up and defend it. So this is not a comprehensive plan so much as a good sales job."
Realtor Janice Parsons, who also lives in Peninsula, fears that the lights will attract more visitors to the park after nightfall by "insinuating" safety.
"Is that really what we want to do?" Parsons says. "So far, the park has been a pretty safe place. What will people do at the park at night?"
Midnight jogging, anyone?
Most crime at the lake involves daytime burglary of motor vehicles, Winters says. The lake is also known as a gay hangout. "We're just trying to keep illicit activity out of the parking lots. Most of the parking lots throughout the [parks] system harbor illicit activities."
Falvo says that the parks department and police asked the White Rock Lake Foundation, a nonprofit group, to look at the lighting issue.
But in a 2005 story in The Advocate, a neighborhood monthly, Falvo said that no money existed in the park budget for lighting and the group was coming up with a strategy to "add light fixtures to trails, at the dock and pier, and parking lots."
She pledged that the group would "privately" raise up to $1 million for the lights.
Instead, the project was written into the park master plan, with a few making decisions for the many.
"There are a lot of people who didn't want lights," says a longtime lake advocate, who asked not to be named. "They never went to the public. The task force is a small group of people from various neighborhoods [set up] to give opinions. But people don't make all the meetings. It's a casual thing. The foundation just did it."
Like the "monstrosity" built to replace the Dreyfuss Club, the advocate says, the lighting plan "was just forced on everybody."
"None of the people who live around the lake have been talked to," says Robin Herndon, who lives on West Lawther Drive. "I like it to be dark and quiet at night. The lights aren't attractive. They look like stainless steel coffins. I just think it's just encouraging people to be here after dark. It's all being pushed forward by users of the lake."









A story about light poles? At least Julie Lyons had the good sense to go out to the pasture on her own. Time to send the other Gray Mare out. Bring back Grimes. Bring back Grimes. Bring back Grimes.
Comment by wick olson — April 30, 2008 @ 07:41PM
Is White Rock Lake turning into a 24-hours-a-day running facility? Do the planners believe that the lake will be safer at night if we can eliminate the dark and thereby attract enough people to run the track at night? Several years ago, gates were installed on the parking lots. The gates were supposed to be closed and padlocked between about 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. every day to discourage use of the park after dark. The gates were seldom closed, so we don't know how effective they would have been. Certainly, the number of newly dropped beer bottles to be found every morning didn't seem to diminish. Then automobile barriers were scattered along the road on the east side of the lake to discourage weekend traffic through there, especially at night. That seems to have worked. But now the philosophy seems to have changed. This wide, hardtop runway is being laid down all along the west side, and apparently a streetlight is to illuminate the surface every 100 feet or so. If the job of city parks is to provide escape from the city's overdevelopment, perhaps all the paving and lighting need to be rethought a little bit.
Comment by Keith Nichols — May 3, 2008 @ 11:23AM
I wonder if the City has done an enviromental impact study on who it will effect migratory bird habitat, night herons (which hunt at night), etc.
Comment by Paul Woodfield — May 3, 2008 @ 04:42PM
I recently returned to north texas after forty years in the hill country, and I want to share my fantasy/memory of White Rock Lake from the days of my childhood when I visited my grandparents in Dallas. The place to go for ice cream was Ashburn's, and it was the only place I could always get raspberry sherbet. White Rock Lake was a small park with golf course and dance pavilion where nearby residents could dance with their sweethearts after sunset. There were about 50 incandescent household lightbulbs to light up the pavilion, and space for about 50 cars to park. It had the atmosphere of a country club,
and was a very pleasant place to be in the summertime.
What is the problem with urban developers who all seem to believe that all public facilities must accommodate the entire population of a city? That makes everything megahuge, and not particularly inviting to any. White Rock Lake and many other neighborhood places should be scaled down, not up. They have been overbuilt already.
Dallasites should start thinking of their parks again as 'country clubs' for nearby residents, and stop worrying about crime, and stop criminalizing the environment.
Comment by Eleanor E. Crockett — May 5, 2008 @ 03:23PM
Planning at White Rock Lake Park might be described as "feudal" - meaning each interest group has their own "fiefdom" - and they often feud.
So they tend to go off on tangents of their own - loosely within the context of an antiquated "master plan".
The White Rock Lake Task Force was established to oversee such proposals and make recommendations to the Park Board.
Some years ago, White Rock Lake Foundation (WRLF) proposed putting lights around the lakefront to the Task Force.
Obviously the park requires some unobtrusive lighting - at the entrance to parking lots, etc. - as anticipated in the "master plan".
The City did not want to pay for it - neither the light poles nor the cost of the utilities.
Members of the Task Force panned the proposal - based on the aesthetics and the lack of evidence that it would reduce crime.
So WRLF took it upon themselves to raise the money and do it themselves - as quoted in the Advocate, February 2005 =
http://www.advocatemag.com/uploads/pdf/ED_02_05.pdf?PHPSESSID=4ca1bc9ba447bbbdea7ee86fb05761b6
WRLF was unable to raise funds for its pet project = http://www.whiterocklakefoundation.org/lighting.html
(Their website shows a rendering of light poles during the day . . . which is not the issue )
So WRLF got Parks to find money in the spillway repair project and got an earmark in a bond issue.
Hossley Lighting Associates was brought in as a "consultant" by WRLF and Parks - to design the plan http://www.hlalighting.com/
And the final plan was done by Hossley, WRLF, Parks (Willis Winters), and a DPD patrol officer.
Only Hossley knows anything about lighting - the WRLF are laymen, Willis Winters is an architect, and the DPD officer was a beat cop.
Parks and WRLF rubber stamped the final plan - with no input from the neighbors or neighborhoods.
And the contractor started putting in the light poles - until the neighbors started to notice.
The cover story on this escapade is "security".
From a security standpoint, the need this much lakeside lighting has never been demonstrated.
What we have instead are anecdotal comments - that this is a "proactive preventative measure"
Most crime in the park is burglary of motor vehicles - during the day
Lighting lake front lots won't prevent that. They will just enable burglars to see into parked cars - and burglarize them at night.
Lakeside lighting will attract more people to the park after the midnight curfew - to loiter and commit crimes.
So on balance, over-lighting the lake shore could make crime go up in the park - not down.
Security cameras would be a better deterrent - they work day and night.
And won't make the lakeside look like a string of motels at night.
Comment by CHip Northrup — May 5, 2008 @ 09:45PM
Fact is this park is paid for by all the citizens of Dallas and some of us only have time at night and weekends to use the park. It is not fair to ask us to pay for a major Dallas park and then have our ability to use it curtailed by a minority of people who live near by and can easily use it any time they choose.
Agree no one wants light pollution put up appropriate lighting but light our trail so we can use it.
Comment by Greg Shelton — May 16, 2008 @ 03:11PM
Anyone can use the park now at night - up until park curfew at midnight
Plenty of ambient light already. Some parts of the park are over-lit at night = T&P Hill , Bath House, etc.
Bicyclists are required by state law to carry lights.
Pedestrians and jogger can do the same
Carrying a light equals zero light pollution - at no cost to the taxpayers.
Fixtures proposed by Parks are "acorn" style - intended for urban street corners = to light up the street
They put all their light out horizontally = not down
So exactly the wrong fixture for a lakeside parking lot.
Not 150+ crime lights left on all night - past curfew - for nothing.
Park curfew is at midnight, so a complete waste after that - and Parks does not turn off the existing light.
Comment by chip Northrup — May 17, 2008 @ 01:18PM